105. (A) Young Siward's confrontation with Macbeth exemplifies noble bravery because he challenges Macbeth despite knowing the latter's fearsome reputation as a tyrant.
(R) Macduff’s insistence on personally killing Macbeth is driven by his desire to fulfill personal justice and avenge his murdered family.
Key Concept: Young Siward’s fearless challenge, Macduff’s personal vengeance
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that Young Siward’s confrontation with Macbeth demonstrates noble bravery, which aligns with the theme of defiance against tyranny as he fearlessly challenges Macbeth despite the danger. This is true, as supported by his dialogue: *"Thou liest, abhorred tyrant; with my sword I'll prove the lie thou speak'st."* The Reason discusses Macduff’s personal motivation for killing Macbeth, which is rooted in avenging his family’s murder. This is also true, as seen in his dialogue: *"If thou be'st slain and with no stroke of mine, My wife and children's ghosts will haunt me still."* However, while both statements are true, the Reason does not explain the Assertion—it discusses an unrelated yet valid thematic point. Thus, the correct relationship is that both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that Young Siward’s confrontation with Macbeth demonstrates noble bravery, which aligns with the theme of defiance against tyranny as he fearlessly challenges Macbeth despite the danger. This is true, as supported by his dialogue: *"Thou liest, abhorred tyrant; with my sword I'll prove the lie thou speak'st."* The Reason discusses Macduff’s personal motivation for killing Macbeth, which is rooted in avenging his family’s murder. This is also true, as seen in his dialogue: *"If thou be'st slain and with no stroke of mine, My wife and children's ghosts will haunt me still."* However, while both statements are true, the Reason does not explain the Assertion—it discusses an unrelated yet valid thematic point. Thus, the correct relationship is that both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.