Key Concept: Sovereignty, Preamble
d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion is partially correct in stating that India's membership in the Commonwealth involves acknowledging the British King/Queen as the symbolic head, but it is incorrect in claiming that this limits India's sovereignty. As per the syllabus, India's membership is voluntary and devoid of any constitutional significance, meaning it does not affect India's sovereign status. The Reason is false because the British King/Queen has no constitutional authority over India; their role in the Commonwealth is purely symbolic and ceremonial.
Therefore:
- Assertion is false (India's sovereignty is not limited by Commonwealth membership).
- Reason is false (British King/Queen has no constitutional authority over India).
However, none of the provided options directly match this conclusion (both false). Given the options, the closest correct choice is that Assertion is false, but Reason is true (d)), though this is also incorrect based on the solution. To align with the options strictly:
The correct answer should involve Assertion being false and Reason being false, but since such an option isn't provided, the question structure may need revision. For now, the most plausible option based on syllabus content is (c), as the Assertion misrepresents the nature of sovereignty, while the Reason is factually incorrect.
Revised analysis for options:
- Assertion is false (sovereignty is not limited).
- Reason is false (no constitutional authority).
Hence, neither option perfectly fits, but (c) is the least incorrect among choices.
Your Answer is correct.
d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion is partially correct in stating that India's membership in the Commonwealth involves acknowledging the British King/Queen as the symbolic head, but it is incorrect in claiming that this limits India's sovereignty. As per the syllabus, India's membership is voluntary and devoid of any constitutional significance, meaning it does not affect India's sovereign status. The Reason is false because the British King/Queen has no constitutional authority over India; their role in the Commonwealth is purely symbolic and ceremonial.
Therefore:
- Assertion is false (India's sovereignty is not limited by Commonwealth membership).
- Reason is false (British King/Queen has no constitutional authority over India).
However, none of the provided options directly match this conclusion (both false). Given the options, the closest correct choice is that Assertion is false, but Reason is true (d)), though this is also incorrect based on the solution. To align with the options strictly:
The correct answer should involve Assertion being false and Reason being false, but since such an option isn't provided, the question structure may need revision. For now, the most plausible option based on syllabus content is (c), as the Assertion misrepresents the nature of sovereignty, while the Reason is factually incorrect.
Revised analysis for options:
- Assertion is false (sovereignty is not limited).
- Reason is false (no constitutional authority).
Hence, neither option perfectly fits, but (c) is the least incorrect among choices.