551. (A) For a given rectangular glass slab, increasing the angle of incidence beyond a certain critical value will prevent any light from emerging out of the slab.
(R) According to Snell's law, when the angle of incidence exceeds the critical angle at the glass-air interface, total internal reflection occurs, preventing refraction at the exit surface.
Key Concept: Refraction, Lateral Shift, Snell's Law
a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion claims that increasing the angle of incidence beyond a certain critical value prevents light from emerging out of the slab. To analyze this:
1. **Critical Angle Calculation**: The critical angle $\theta_c$ for the glass-air interface is given by $\sin\theta_c = \frac{1}{_{a}n_g}$. If the angle of incidence inside the glass slab ($r$) exceeds $\theta_c$, total internal reflection occurs at the exit surface.
2. **Relationship Between Angles**: For refraction at the entry surface (air-glass), Snell’s law states $\sin i = _{a}n_g \sin p$. Here, $p$ is the angle of refraction inside the slab, which becomes the angle of incidence ($r$) at the exit surface (glass-air). As $\sin i$ increases, $\sin r$ also increases, provided $i$ is below 90°.
3. **Condition for Emergence**: Light emerges only if $r < \theta_c$ at the exit surface. If $r \geq \theta_c$, total internal reflection occurs, and no refraction happens at the exit surface, preventing emergence as stated in the Assertion.
4. **Reason Analysis**: The Reason correctly identifies that total internal reflection occurs when the angle of incidence exceeds $\theta_c$ at the glass-air interface, which is consistent with the Assertion.
Thus, both Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason directly explains the Assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion claims that increasing the angle of incidence beyond a certain critical value prevents light from emerging out of the slab. To analyze this:
1. **Critical Angle Calculation**: The critical angle $\theta_c$ for the glass-air interface is given by $\sin\theta_c = \frac{1}{_{a}n_g}$. If the angle of incidence inside the glass slab ($r$) exceeds $\theta_c$, total internal reflection occurs at the exit surface.
2. **Relationship Between Angles**: For refraction at the entry surface (air-glass), Snell’s law states $\sin i = _{a}n_g \sin p$. Here, $p$ is the angle of refraction inside the slab, which becomes the angle of incidence ($r$) at the exit surface (glass-air). As $\sin i$ increases, $\sin r$ also increases, provided $i$ is below 90°.
3. **Condition for Emergence**: Light emerges only if $r < \theta_c$ at the exit surface. If $r \geq \theta_c$, total internal reflection occurs, and no refraction happens at the exit surface, preventing emergence as stated in the Assertion.
4. **Reason Analysis**: The Reason correctly identifies that total internal reflection occurs when the angle of incidence exceeds $\theta_c$ at the glass-air interface, which is consistent with the Assertion.
Thus, both Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason directly explains the Assertion.