Key Concept: Scalar Triple Product Properties
b) $[\vec{a} + \vec{b}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}]$
[Solution Description]
Using the properties of scalar triple product:
1. $[\vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}, \vec{a} + \vec{b}]$ expands to $2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$ (cyclic property).
2. $[\vec{a} + \vec{b}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}]$ also expands to $2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$.
3. $[\vec{a} + 2\vec{b}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + 2[\vec{b}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + 0 = [\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$.
4. $[\vec{a}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{b} - \vec{c}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{b}] - [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{c}, \vec{b}] - [\vec{a}, \vec{c}, \vec{c}] = 0 - [\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}] + [\vec{a} \vec{c} \vec{b}] - 0 = -2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$.
None of these directly give $3[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$, but considering linear combinations:
$[\vec{a} + \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{c}, \vec{a}] + [\vec{b}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{b}, \vec{c}, \vec{a}] + [\vec{c}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{c}, \vec{c}, \vec{a}] = [\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}] + 0 + 0 + [\vec{b} \vec{c} \vec{a}] + 0 + 0 = 2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$
However, by carefully combining, we can derive that:
$[\vec{a} + \vec{b}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] = 3[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$
So none of the given options match, but the closest option based on common expansions is:
Your Answer is correct.
b) $[\vec{a} + \vec{b}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}]$
[Solution Description]
Using the properties of scalar triple product:
1. $[\vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}, \vec{a} + \vec{b}]$ expands to $2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$ (cyclic property).
2. $[\vec{a} + \vec{b}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}]$ also expands to $2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$.
3. $[\vec{a} + 2\vec{b}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + 2[\vec{b}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + 0 = [\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$.
4. $[\vec{a}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{b} - \vec{c}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{b}] - [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{c}, \vec{b}] - [\vec{a}, \vec{c}, \vec{c}] = 0 - [\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}] + [\vec{a} \vec{c} \vec{b}] - 0 = -2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$.
None of these directly give $3[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$, but considering linear combinations:
$[\vec{a} + \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}] = [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{c}, \vec{a}] + [\vec{b}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{b}, \vec{c}, \vec{a}] + [\vec{c}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] + [\vec{c}, \vec{c}, \vec{a}] = [\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}] + 0 + 0 + [\vec{b} \vec{c} \vec{a}] + 0 + 0 = 2[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$
However, by carefully combining, we can derive that:
$[\vec{a} + \vec{b}, \vec{b} + \vec{c}, \vec{c} + \vec{a}] + [\vec{a}, \vec{b}, \vec{c}] = 3[\vec{a} \vec{b} \vec{c}]$
So none of the given options match, but the closest option based on common expansions is: