Key Concept: Mechanical Advantage, Velocity Ratio, Efficiency
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
First, let us analyze the assertion: Given $VR = 5$, $\eta = 80%$. The condition for a machine to act as a speed multiplier is that the load moves faster than the effort, i.e., $d_l > d_e$ or $VR 1$, so the machine cannot act as a speed multiplier. Therefore, the assertion is true.
Next, the reason states that for a speed multiplier, $VR$ must be less than 1. This is correct because $VR = \frac{d_e}{d_l}$, and for the load to move faster than the effort ($d_l > d_e$), $VR$ must indeed be less than 1.
However, the reason does not explain why the given machine cannot act as a speed multiplier; it only states a general condition. Thus, both are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
First, let us analyze the assertion: Given $VR = 5$, $\eta = 80%$. The condition for a machine to act as a speed multiplier is that the load moves faster than the effort, i.e., $d_l > d_e$ or $VR 1$, so the machine cannot act as a speed multiplier. Therefore, the assertion is true.
Next, the reason states that for a speed multiplier, $VR$ must be less than 1. This is correct because $VR = \frac{d_e}{d_l}$, and for the load to move faster than the effort ($d_l > d_e$), $VR$ must indeed be less than 1.
However, the reason does not explain why the given machine cannot act as a speed multiplier; it only states a general condition. Thus, both are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.